> Can anyone confirm this for me: > > Cloud height (ft.) = 227 x N > > N = ground temp (degrees F.) - dew point(degrees F.) > -------------- > Also any other misc. about dew point is welcome.
The derivation in Atmospheric Thermodynamics shows that for dry adiabatic ascent :
dTd = (Cp Td2)/(.62197 Lv) dT/T
T : temp
Td : dew point
Cp : specific heat @ constant pressure
Lv : vaporization latent heat
Thus, the equation you cite depends on initial dew point. The authors choose T ~ Td ~ 273 K, but cumulus convection is most relevant for T ~ 300 K, Td ~ 289 K, so their approximation can be slightly improved. Using finite differences (MKS units) :
dTd = ((1006.3)(289)2)/((.62197)(2466400)(300)) dT
dTd = .18263 dT
® (Tds - Tdo) = .18263 (Ts - To)'o' referRing to values at ground, and 's' to values at saturation point (LCL).
For these conditions, the dry adiabatic lapse rate is ~ 9.66 °K/km = .00966 °K/m , so
dT = - .00966 dZ
Z : height above ground
® (Ts - To) = -.00966 (Zs - Zo)from ground to the saturation point (LCL).
Because Ts = Tds, you can calculate :
Zs - Zo = (To - Tdo)/((.00966)(1 - .18263)) = 126.6 (To - Tdo).
Using English units,
Zs - Zo = (126.6)(3.2808 ft/m)(Td - To)(5/9 °F/°C) = 230.8 (Td - To)
Confirmed
, so long as using it you are aware of factors
such as mixing ascent beginning from various altitudes, etc., which cause real cloud base to
slightly differ from this (probably slightly higher, perhaps
Zs - Zo = 250 (Td - To)
Note that because of Td2 in the original equation, increasing Td
increases cloud base estimation for a specific dew point depression.
Text is copyright of Joseph Bartlo, though may be used with proper crediting.